The U.S. college admissions scandal that rocked wealthy families and elite institutions involves millions of dollars in alleged bribes and dozens of people, including sports coaches, celebrities and high-profile business owners.
Court documents filed in the case offer eyebrow-raising details, including allegations that photos of prospective students were altered to make them look like athletes, and that many parents schemed to alter test scores without their kids鈥 knowledge.
At least nine athletic coaches and 33 parents were among those charged in the evolving scandal.
Here are some of the bizarre details this week:
Faking athletic prowess
William 鈥淩ick鈥 Singer, who pleaded guilty to multiple charges and is described as the mastermind of the scheme, was among those who fabricated 鈥渁thletic profiles鈥 for students, according to the court documents.
The profiles included false athletic credentials, fake honors and staged or fake photos.
In some instances, parents participated in faking the photos of their children playing sports, while in other cases, the accused 鈥渦sed software such as PhotoShop to insert the applicants鈥 faces onto the bodies of legitimate athletes,鈥 court documents say.
The fake athletic profiles were used to admit students into elite schools as purported athletic recruits 鈥 regardless of whether they were actually good at any given sport -- the documents say.
In one example, actress Lori Loughlin and her husband, fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli, allegedly gave $500,000 to have their two daughters labeled as recruits to the University of Southern California crew team, even though neither girl participated in the sport.
Exploiting rules for students with disabilities
Those accused of running the admissions bribery scheme exploited a college entrance exam policy aimed at helping students with disabilities, court documents allege.
According to the federal affidavit, parents were told to have their children 鈥減urport to have learning disabilities鈥 so they could get extra time to write the college entrance exam or take the test at one of two centres that would make it easier to alter the score.
The following exchange between one of the defendants and one of the witnesses in the case was included in the affidavit:
鈥淚t鈥檚 the homerun of homeruns.鈥
鈥淎nd it works?鈥
鈥淓very time. (laughing)鈥
Using students鈥 writing samples to cheat on tests
Jane Buckingham, the CEO of a Los Angeles-based 鈥渂outique marketing company鈥 and one of the parents named in the affidavit, allegedly agreed to pay $50,000 so that someone else could take a college entrance exam on behalf of her son.
She allegedly asked that her son be sent a copy of the test that he could do at home so that he would believe he took it himself.
She then allegedly sent a sample of her son鈥檚 handwriting so that the alleged scammer could match the writing style while taking the test.
鈥淵es. He has not great writing,鈥 Buckingham allegedly said about her son.
鈥淩uh Ro!鈥
The FBI alleges that actress Felicity Huffman and her 鈥渟pouse鈥 鈥 actor William H. Macy, who is not named in the court document 鈥 made a purported charitable donation of $15,000 to participate in the college entrance exam scheme on behalf of their oldest daughter.
The documents allege that Huffman arranged to have someone secretly correct her daughter鈥檚 answers on the entrance exam, but the plan was almost thwarted when the daughter鈥檚 high school offered to supervise the test-taking.
Huffman allegedly wrote in an email: 鈥淩uh Ro! Looks like [my daughter鈥檚 school] wants to provide own proctor.鈥
The test was ultimately arranged on a weekend and Huffman鈥檚 daughter received an allegedly altered score of 1420 out of a possible 1600 on the SAT exam.