TORONTO -- A study by the University of Melbourne in Australia has found that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected global armed conflicts by changing the strategic environments for the groups involved, with the coronavirus escalating violence in several countries.

Precedence of infectious diseases influencing armed conflict in the past is what drove the initial study.

鈥淵ou saw local riots and protests against Ebola-related measures in Western Africa some years ago, and you saw the Spanish Flu interfering with military logistics at the end of the First World War,鈥� said in an interview with CTVNews.ca Thursday from Melbourne.

鈥淪o there has already been some research to establish that there is a link between pandemics or diseases with conflict dynamics.鈥�

The study, published in 鈥溾�� examines armed conflicts in nine countries within the first six months of 2020 that had reliable data on both the pandemic and on-going conflicts.

Ide chose Afghanistan, Colombia, India, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand and Yemen due to their similar coronavirus metrics over the same study period.

He found that Afghanistan, Colombia, Thailand and Yemen saw a decrease in armed conflict during the study period 鈥� but necessarily for humanitarian reasons, while the other five countries, India, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya and the Philippines, all saw an increase in conflicts.

AFGHANISTAN

Ide found that the Taliban did not carry out their usual spring offensive in Afghanistan during the study period as the government battled the pandemic 鈥� leading to a noted decline in a conflict that has been waged for decades.

鈥淸But] the Taliban did so for a very strategic reason,鈥� Ide said. 鈥淭hey didn鈥檛 do it because they wanted to鈥pen the country for international aid and give people time to respond to the damage..., and tried to get community infection rates low and by doing so would try to get more widespread acceptance.鈥�

Ide said the Taliban exploited the pandemic to set themselves up in contrast to the government they painted as 鈥渋ncompetent鈥� in order to extend their influence and garner support for their cause in communities.

COLOMBIA

The left-wing National Liberation Army (ELN) in Colombia, Ide said 鈥� allowing the government to focus troops and manpower on pandemic logistics.

Regardless, Colombia was hit hard by COVID-19 and the ELN operated similarly to the Taliban, according to the study.

鈥淭here are credible reports about them (ELN) explicitly targeting youths that had to leave school because the schools were closed,鈥� Ide said. 鈥淥r young people who lost their jobs and are now economically struggling, trying to recruit in that situation.鈥�

Ide said that the decline in conflict intensity in the initial stages of the pandemic outbreak may 鈥渟et the stage for a more intense conflict in the future,鈥� if the rebels succeed in recruiting more to their cause.

THAILAND

In southern Thailand, a quasi-ceasefire between the Barisan Revolusi Nasional (BRN) and Thai security forces in the initial outbreak after 17 years of insurgent attacks.

But Ide pointed out that the severe travel restrictions enforced by the Thai government in order to curb the spread of COVID-19 severely affected the BRN鈥檚 operation, who normally travel extensively to recruit new members 鈥� especially in Malaysia.

鈥淭here were reports of them not being able obtain food because of the enormous loss of income, due to lockdowns in the local villages [that support them],鈥� Ide said.

YEMEN

Yemen provided an interesting case study due to the international nature of the conflict, Ide said.

There wasn鈥檛 much a change in the conflict dynamics March and April, but a decline occurred later on in the study period as Saudi Arabia was heavily affected by the pandemic 鈥� which then forced them to reduce some of its support for their forces.

Alternatively, in the Houthi rebel-held areas of Yemen, the humanitarian crisis of the conflict, along with pandemic stressors, led to 鈥溾�� by the public, Ide said.

鈥淭hey also received less support from Iran, which also suffered heavily from COVID but also from U.S. sanctions,鈥� Ide said. 鈥淏asically, both sides鈥� capabilities to confront each other really declined in May and June.鈥�

INDIA

India saw a rise in armed conflict during the study period, with violent clashes in the Kashmir region between Kashmiri separatists facing off against the Indian military, as well as conflicts between Pakistan and India.

鈥淪o what mostly drove the increase in conflict intensity鈥ere basically due to two factors,鈥� Ide said.

鈥淭he first being that there is some evidence that Pakistan sponsors or supports these insurgents in Kashmir, to encourage them to increase their attacks [on Indian forces] because they perceived them to be weak and struggling with the pandemic.鈥�

The second factor, Ide explained, was that while Indian government enacted a 鈥減retty comprehensive lockdown in Kashmir, and sealing it way from international media attention鈥aunched more intense counter-insurgency efforts and鈥rack[ed] down on any pro-Pakistani sympathy expressions.鈥�

IRAQ

Iraq had an increase in armed conflict, but Ide noted that the overall intensity did not change that much 鈥� a 鈥渧ery slight upward trend鈥� in scale that was not linear.

What did increase were attacks by ISIS in April, May, and June.

鈥淭he Iraqi government was really in trouble,鈥� he said. 鈥淭hey had enormous economic loss, they had to go head-to-head and use troops and funds to combat the pandemic 鈥� the international coalition supporting the government partially withdrew troops or stopped their activities.鈥�

鈥淭he Iraqi government was really in a position of weakness.鈥�

Ide said and the thin resources at hand to the government to expand territorial control, conquer new areas and to stage more attacks.

LIBYA

The civil war in Libya between the Government of National Accord鈥檚 (GNA) forces and the Libyan National Army escalated during the study period, after a ceasefire brokered in January was broken, Ide said.

鈥淎s soon as international attention shifted to the pandemic鈥hey really escalated the conflict, tried to make gains while hoping the other side is weakened because of the pandemic, hoping to score an easy military victory鈥� Ide said. 鈥淚t didn鈥檛 happen.鈥�

The that the pandemic was bolstering the 15-month conflict, citing the history of more than 850 broken ceasefire agreements and 鈥渁 tide of civilian deaths鈥� on top of a worsening outbreak.

PAKISTAN

The ongoing conflict with India saw a rise in armed conflict in Pakistan during the study period 鈥� which were unrelated to the pandemic, but also a rise in Taliban-affiliated groups and anti-government sentiments due to pandemic restrictions, Ide said.

鈥淭here were a lot of ,鈥� Ide said. 鈥淭here were restrictions on religious gatherings, which religious groups did not like, and there were some negative economic impacts which affected the local people.鈥�

Ide said those two factors could have been exploited by the Taliban in a quest to recruit more followers.

Later in the study period, a swath Pakistani government officials were struck with COVID-19, leaving the country with a leadership crisis, which saw an increase of attacks by Taliban groups in May.

THE PHILIPPINES

The New People鈥檚 Army (NPA) -- a sect of guerrilla communist rebels, who have been fighting in the Philippines for more than 50 years -- initially declared support for the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres call for a 鈥済lobal ceasefire鈥� in the early days of the pandemic, which was then echoed by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.

It would not last.

鈥淏oth parties did not stick to it, and did not extend it after one month in mid-April,鈥� Ide said, noting that afterwards there was an increase in attacks from the government side 鈥� as Duterte 鈥済enerally strengthened the government鈥檚 authoritarian grip鈥� on society.

鈥淏asically [they] used that lockdown and lack of international attention to crack down heavily on all sorts of opposition, including the communist rebels.鈥�

Duterte , even as the Armed Forces of the Philippines announced they will not recommend a holiday truce with the rebels.

Ide said that initially his research gave him 鈥渁 lot of hope鈥� that ceasefires and peace accords could be brokered during a global health crisis 鈥� but his research showed otherwise.

鈥淭here was initially quite a bit of optimism that these shared common external threats to all of the groups across the board鈥ight act as a force to curb violence and open a window of opportunity to engage in negotiations,鈥� he said. 鈥淲hat I found is that there is very little evidence of that so far.鈥�

There were a few symbolic gestures he found in his study, but overall 鈥渢hey did not prevail,鈥� he said.

鈥淚f there was a decline in violence, it was mostly for strategic reasons and not because of any health diplomacy.鈥�