Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch has received plenty of attention for her proposal to screen all immigrants for 鈥淐anadian values,鈥 but she鈥檚 not the only leadership hopeful with ideas about how to overhaul the system.
Here鈥檚 a closer look at where the candidates stand on immigration -- including their views about how many should be accepted, how they should be screened and who should be encouraged to come.
Chris Alexander
- The former immigration minister under Stephen Harper, Alexander said at his campaign launch that his government 鈥済ot immigration right.鈥
- 鈥淲e were able to sustain the highest levels of Canadian immigration in our history 鈥 because our job market was tight,鈥 he said at a debate in Saskatoon in November. Immigration levels under Harper were as high as 270,000.
- As minister, Alexander faced criticism over delays in meeting the Conservatives鈥 commitment to resettle Syrian refugees.
- He supported a ban on niqabs at citizenships ceremonies that a court later struck down.
Maxime Bernier
- How many? 250,000 per year, which isa cut from the Liberals鈥 record-high target of 300,000.
- Who should come? 鈥淪treamline the process for hiring specialized workers abroad鈥 and 鈥減ut slightly more emphasis on economic immigration,鈥 he says. He would also 鈥渟lightly reduce鈥 family reunification class immigration.
- On screening: 鈥淲ould increase resources for CSIS, the RCMP and (CIC), do background checks on all classes of immigrants (and) conduct more face-to-face interviews if deemed necessary.鈥
- On refugees: Would accept 鈥渟lightly鈥 fewer, with more privately-sponsored and fewer government sponsored
- 鈥淥ur immigration policy should not aim to forcibly change the cultural character and social fabric of Canada, as radical proponents of multiculturalism want,鈥 Bernier has written.
Steven Blaney
- How many? Said he would 鈥渞educe the annual number of newcomers, immigrants and refugees鈥︹ to roughly where they were under Harper
- Would establish a taskforce to 鈥渄e-politicize the process of establishing immigration targets based on labor market studies鈥
- Would distribute new Canadians 鈥渂ased on labor needs in different regions 鈥︹
- Would 鈥渂eef up鈥 screening by CBSA and CSIS
Michael Chong
- How many? 鈥淔ocusing on a specific number misses the point,鈥 he says. 鈥淲e need an evidence-based policy for immigration that puts Canada's economic interests at the forefront.鈥
- Who should come? Those with 鈥渟kills and training to strengthen our economy鈥 with a preference for younger people in order to address the 鈥渄emographic challenges of an aging population鈥
- On screening: Face-to-face values screening is 鈥渟imply a divisive tactic to stir fear and play politics with immigration.鈥
Kellie Leitch
- How many? Calls targets 鈥渁rbitrary,鈥 but said she 鈥渨ill never again allow 270,000 immigrants into the country in one year without a face-to-face interview.鈥
- On Screening: 鈥淚 will ensure all immigrants, refugees, and visitors receive a face-to-face interview with a trained immigration officer,鈥 Leitch said. 鈥淎s part of that screening we (will) ensure that they agree with our shared Canadian values of hard, work, generosity, freedom, and tolerance.鈥
Pierre Lemieux
- How many? 鈥淩ational immigration targets vary year by year in concert with the needs of our economy but priority number one needs to be protecting Canadians from radical Islamic terrorism,鈥 he said.
- On screening: 鈥淎 Canadian values test won鈥檛 make Canadians safe: radical Islamic terrorists won鈥檛 share their true values with our immigration officials 鈥 We need to increase and enhance our assessment processes, including face-to-face screening, particularly of those from high risk regions where radical Islamic terrorism is prevalent.鈥
Deepak Obhrai
- How many? 275,000 per year says Obhrai, an immigrant from Tanzania
- Who should come? Mostly skilled workers, but also up to 10,000 鈥渓ow-skilled鈥 workers annually selected lottery system
- On screening: Conduct face-to-face interviews only 鈥渨hen issues are flagged鈥
- On refugees: More privately-sponsored refugees and fewer government-sponsored
- Would cut funding for settlement programs, with the exception of those for refugees
Erin O鈥橳oole
- How many? 鈥淚t鈥檚 not about more or less鈥 but 鈥渄oing the work to determine what our actual needs are and recalibrating our immigration system to meet those needs,鈥 O鈥橳oole tells 麻豆影视. At the Saskatoon debate, he said he supports a number in the 鈥270,000 range.鈥
- Who should come? 鈥淚 will restrict the (Temporary Foreign Worker) program significantly because it isn鈥檛 working for Canadians or for newcomers to Canada. Some industries, like agriculture, seasonal and live-in care, have legitimate needs for temporary workers and that will be allowed to continue.鈥
- On screening: 鈥淔or well over a year now, I have been asking the CBSA, the RCMP and other security agencies about our practices ... I have been and continue to be satisfied with the current security screening measures of our immigration system 鈥 Screening should continue to be reserved, as is standard practice, for refugees, displaced persons and countries requiring travel visas.鈥
- On refugees: 鈥淧riority will be given to the Yazidi people" and "interpreters who served bravely alongside Canadian Armed Forces members during the Afghanistan War.鈥
Rick Peterson
- Strongly 鈥渧alues tests of citizenship,鈥 which he calls 鈥淥rwellian鈥
- Wants 鈥渟marter immigration policies, using tiered security screening and increased terrorist surveillance鈥
Lisa Raitt
- How many? 鈥淲hen the Liberals talk about a number, don鈥檛 be taken in,鈥 she said when asked in Saskatoon. What matters, according to Raitt, is the proportion of economic immigrants, versus refugees and family members. She did not say what the mix should be.
- On screening: "Putting something like a values test in that place, in that space, I think is going to have the opposite effect and it'll chill people wanting to come here," Raitt told CTV鈥檚 Question Period.
Andrew Saxton
- How many? Between 260,000 and 285,000, he says. 鈥淭he Liberals have presented no economic case for going higher.鈥
- Who should come? 鈥淲e need to look at welcoming immigrants who can integrate quickly, not just for our economic well-being, but also our national security.鈥
- On screening: 鈥淚 support more face to face interviews to assess adaptability.鈥
- On refugees: 鈥淲hen Justin brings in 25,000 Syrian refugees in a matter of months, without a plan to help them integrate, I feel this is irresponsible governing 鈥 Not only is it tough on the refugees 鈥 it is tough on our taxpayers who are footing the bill while refugees are left to figure out on their own how to find work, find housing, and learn our culture.鈥
- Would 鈥渆nsure we have plans and infrastructure in place to help (immigrants) integrate as quickly as possible. That familiar story about doctors from India coming here and ending up driving taxis -- it's not without basis. We need to help them put their skills to work, so we all benefit.鈥
Andrew Scheer
- How many? 鈥淣umbers based on logic,鈥 Sheer said in Saskatoon. 鈥淲e shouldn鈥檛 participate in an auction -- one party trying to have a bigger number than the other.鈥
- Who should come? 鈥淚t should be based on a process, based on economic indicators and what our society needs.鈥
Brad Trost
- How many? 250,000 this year, rising and falling 鈥渄epending on the economic conditions and the ability to absorb new Canadians鈥
- On screening: 鈥淭emporary immigration bans on nations or groups who pose a direct security risk to Canadians鈥 and 鈥渁ll immigrants who present as a medium or high risk to the security of Canadians must be screened in person by officials鈥
- Who should come? 鈥淚f you know new Canadians you know there鈥檚 two types of them: the ones that come here because they choose Canada and the ones that come here to use Canada,鈥 he said in Saskatoon. 鈥淲ith economic criteria we鈥檒l get more of the ones who choose Canada.鈥
