While waiting to enter the television studio, MPs or strategists representing their parties on political shows are almost always a congenial bunch.
They sit in the green room and small talk about everyday matters like normal humans. From my hosting experience, there are rarely signs of partisan tension or personal animosity.
Only when the camera red light comes on do the combatants engage in the battle of their talking points. And even when the discussion gets overheated, there鈥檚 rarely lingering acrimony after the show goes to commercial. The odd trio of MPs have been known to adjourn for drinks together.
But watching the talking heads for the Conservative leadership frontrunners Monday on CTV鈥檚 Power Play with host Evan Solomon was to see a very different dynamic at play.
These weren鈥檛 partisans discussing differing party positions. They were strong intelligent Conservative spokespersons engaged in take-no-prisoners internecine warfare.
The clash between Jenni Byrne of the Pierre Poilievre campaign and Tasha Kheiriddin from Jean Charest鈥檚 team was toxic, personal and consumed with burning all the bridges which could reunite the party after the September 10 vote.
Policy differences were ignored amid a barrage of accusations and allegations flying over their rival鈥檚 failing fitness to hold the job.
After being accused of lying amid a cross-talk cacophony of bitter disagreement, Kheirridin nicely summed up the theme of the segment. 鈥淲hen you start scorched earth, eventually you鈥檙e going to get it back.鈥�
So there you have the sorry state of the race to become Canada鈥檚 Official Opposition Leader, traditionally a launch pad to the prime minister鈥檚 title.
It鈥檚 scorched earth with a month to go before the FIRST debate even starts raising the temperature to a boil.
One can only image what the public will think of either frontrunner鈥檚 qualifications for leadership if this blitzkrieg of character assassination continues for the five more months until voting day.
By then the confused Conservative member will be convinced Charest is a Justin Trudeau clone and Poilievre is Maxime Bernier鈥檚 twin.
It sets up the spectacle of the first governing party of Confederation being ripped in two while the Liberal enemy is laughing on the sidelines.
This is much more than a generation gap between a senior citizen candidate talking child care while the Generation X entry preaches the gospel of cryptocurrency.
It鈥檚 antagonistically personal to a level I鈥檝e never seen before.
Even before Charest declared, Poilievre was campaigning against him as a Liberal who didn鈥檛 rate true-blue consideration for the leadership.
But Charest lowered the bar to limbo backbreaker levels when he told CTV on Sunday that Poilievre鈥檚 support for the Freedom Convoy 鈥榙isqualifies鈥� him from leadership contention.
That over-the-top position could well be the first sign of Charest鈥檚 deepening desperation.
Poilievre is attracting big crowds to enthusiastic events where memberships get sold to people and their families who are pumped up to actually vote.
Charest鈥檚 gatherings seem more infrequent and modest in size with a low-energy vibe that falls far short of mania.
What鈥檚 worse news for the former Quebec premier, as my friend Chantal Hebert of the Toronto Star points out, is that the harder-right Conservative tilt espoused by Poilievre is on the ascendency in Quebec while the Charest-led provincial Liberals are in the polling dumpster. That doesn鈥檛 bode well for Charest, who needs a significant Quebec surge to carry him into the leadership.
And so, with 150 bitterly-divided days to go before the leadership is decided, the two leading rivals have embraced a strategy of mutual assured destruction.
If they can鈥檛 win, the other is going to lose as leader of a badly fractured party.
But for political show hosts, this much is undoubtedly clear: Don鈥檛 let Jean Charest, Pierre Poilievre or their respective spokespersons in the same green room at the same time. War will break out before they make it to air.
That鈥檚 the bottom line.
