A Toronto restaurant has been ordered to pay $10,000 in compensation to a black man who, along with his dinner companions, was asked to pre-pay for a meal on his birthday four years ago.
the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ruled that Hong Shing Chinese Restaurant discriminated against Emile Wickham on the basis of his race and must pay $10,000 for 鈥渋njury to his dignity, feelings and self-respect.鈥�
Wickham told the Human Rights Tribunal that he and three friends, all of them black, went to the downtown Toronto restaurant in the early morning hours of his birthday, May 3, 2014. After they were seated at a table, the server told them they would have to pay in advance for their meals. When they asked why, the server told them it was restaurant policy.
Even though they obliged the server鈥檚 request, Wickham told the tribunal it did not sit well with him. So he got up and asked three groups of other diners whether they had to pre-pay for their meals 鈥� and all of them said no.
Wickham told the tribunal that other patrons looked either white, mixed race or East Asian and that he and his friends were the only black customers in the restaurant at the time. He said all restaurant staff were East Asian.
Wickham then asked the server to explain why he and his friends were the only ones who had to pre-pay for their meals. According to evidence given to the tribunal, the server did not offer any explanation and simply asked Wickham鈥檚 group if they wanted their money back. A restaurant staff member who appeared to have a supervisory role also offered them a refund and behaved in 鈥渁 dismissive manner,鈥� Wickham told the tribunal.
No one appeared at the October, 2017 tribunal hearing on behalf of the restaurant.
In a written response to Wickham鈥檚 complaint, filed with the tribunal two years before the hearing, the restaurant said it attracts 鈥渟omething of a transient crowd鈥� and it was common for some customers to 鈥渄ine and dash.鈥�
As a result, the restaurant said that it adopted a policy 鈥渕any years ago鈥� that non-regular customers would be asked to pre-pay for their meals.
鈥淭here was never any intent to discriminate against the applicant,鈥� the restaurant said. But the tribunal concluded that Wickham and his friends were racially profiled.
Wickham, who came to Canada from Trinidad, told the tribunal the incident had a profound impact on him and his perception of Toronto. Two of his friends who were with him that night also testified before the tribunal and said they felt the incident was racially motivated.
鈥淚n essence, the applicant was presumed to be a potential thief in waiting despite any evidence to that effect,鈥� Esi Codjoe, the vice-chair of the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario, wrote in the decision.
鈥淗is mere presence as a Black man in a restaurant was presumed to be sufficient evidence of his presumed propensity to engage in criminal behaviour.鈥�
, Wickham said he and his friends were 鈥渄enied our dignity鈥� at the restaurant that day.
鈥淚 would say that I would give all of this back to just spend two hours with my friends, just bonding for my birthday. That experience was taken away from me,鈥� he said.
鈥淲e as a nation in Canada need to have a frank discussion about how we treat our black population and Indigenous population,鈥� Wickham said, adding that change requires real action, not 鈥減latitudes.鈥�
In a statement to 麻豆影视, the current owner of Hong Shing Chinese Restaurant said the Human Rights Tribunal鈥檚 decision is under appeal.
鈥淲e are deeply concerned about the situation and the people affected, with an added consideration that the reported claim occurred four years ago when the restaurant was under different management,鈥� Colin Li said in the statement.
鈥淭here are a number of sensitivities and considerations about this situation, and for that reason, the tribunal outcome is under appeal by legal representatives.鈥�
Li said the restaurant cannot comment further at this time, but he and staff are 鈥渄edicated to be a committed, inclusive and responsible member of the community.鈥�
