麻豆影视

Skip to main content

Do vaccine mandates violate Canadians' charter rights?

Share

Various vaccine mandates have been in place across Canada for months, requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination to access non-essential businesses, attend certain events or board planes and trains, for example.

The mandates have faced opposition from Canadians who say they are concerned their rights and freedoms are being infringed upon.

THE CLAIM

One of the most commonly referenced arguments against vaccine mandates is that they violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, or, more specifically, of the charter, which reads:

鈥淓veryone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.鈥

But, according to constitutional law experts, these claims are not exactly true. While vaccine mandates may have an impact on charter rights, whether it is an illegal infringement on those rights is unlikely when looking at specific case law.

ANALYSIS

Before we dive into the fine print, it鈥檚 important to note that both of our experts agree nothing is certain in the law. Certainly, if someone wanted to challenge the government over the charter, they could. But they say successfully arguing such a case is very unlikely.

As Cheryl Milne, executive director of the at the University of Toronto explains, a charter argument may apply under , which discusses equality, for someone with a disability who cannot get vaccinated. Or under , which deals with freedom of religion and expression.

But Milne points out there are very few circumstances in which people cannot be vaccinated and have sound proof of that.

Vaccine mandates are not 鈥渇orced vaccination鈥

Would-be claimants would face multiple hurdles to prove their case. The first would involve establishing an infringement of a protected interest in 鈥渓ife, liberty or security of the person.鈥

But, contrary to claims otherwise, vaccine mandates do not constitute forced vaccination.

鈥淭here are some people who think that vaccine passports and the use of the word 鈥榤andate鈥 means that we鈥檙e holding people down and forcing them to be vaccinated,鈥 Milne told CTVNews.ca by phone this week.

鈥淚t鈥檚 just limiting the ability to participate in certain activities if they don鈥檛 have a vaccine. If, in fact, the government were forcing people to be vaccinated 鈥 like actually physically holding people down and giving them a vaccine 鈥 that would probably be a pretty clear charter breach.鈥

Mandates offer a choice: receive or decline the vaccine. Those who decline are instead presented with a different set of options.

鈥淚n the case of students, you can try to enroll in online classes, or you can take a term off. In the case of employees, you can try to seek accommodation or take a leave,鈥 Samuel E. Trosow, associate professor in the faculty of law and faculty of information and media studies at Western University, told CTVNews.ca by phone.

鈥淭hese may be inconvenient and unwanted options, but they are options.鈥

Even if a claimant were to make out that there has been a violation of the liberty interest or security of person interest, they would also have to prove that the infringement was under circumstances that violated principles of fundamental justice. In other words, the mandate is arbitrary, overly broad or grossly disproportionate.

Because vaccine mandates seek to protect the health and safety of the public, citing evidence that vaccines reduce the severity of illness and can reduce transmission, in cases where lockdowns, masking, social distancing and testing cannot, Trosow says it would be hard to argue any of those points.

鈥淲hen you really look at the case law, and really understand what the specific requirements are, the argument falls apart,鈥 he says.

鈥楽ubject to reasonable limits鈥

Even if a claimant were to establish a violation of Section 7, the violation could be upheld under of the charter.

鈥淪ection 1 of the charter says 鈥榓ll of the rights and freedoms in the charter are subject to such reasonable limits as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society,鈥欌 explained Milne.

鈥淲hat that means is that there is this kind of proportional, reasonable approach that governments can actually limit people鈥檚 rights so long as they have a very good reason and can demonstrate why. A global pandemic might just be one of those reasons.

[But] they can only go so far as what is minimally impairing of the right. Stopping people from going to a restaurant might be considered minimally impairing when the consequences are further spread of a highly contagious virus.鈥

For example, in September 2020, Halifax resident Kimberly Taylor after she was initially denied an exemption to the province's travel ban after her mother's death.

Taylor argued that the province overstepped its authority and violated her constitutional rights. But a Supreme Court judge ruled that the because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Although vaccine mandates may have an impact on charter rights, whether it is an illegal infringement on those rights is unlikely.

"If someone says, 鈥榲accine passports are a breach of charter rights鈥 鈥 full stop, without the nuance 鈥 I would say it鈥檚 misleading,鈥 said Milne.

鈥淭hey would have to say they don鈥檛 think it would withstand the test of Section 1, it鈥檚 not reasonable. And I鈥檓 on the side that it鈥檚 probably reasonable, but people can differ about that.鈥

As Trosow points out, 鈥渨hile nothing is certain in the law 鈥 there are always perils of litigation 鈥 all of the good jurisprudence points to the conclusion that a Section 7 claim would not be actionable.

To make up spurious legal claims as an excuse [not to get vaccinated] I find very questionable.鈥

Edited by CTVNews.ca producer Adam Ward

CTVNews.ca Top Stories

The British Columbia election campaign is set to officially start today, with Lt.-Gov. Janet Austin issuing the writ for the Oct. 19 vote.

A northern Ontario man is facing a $12,000 fine after illegally shooting a moose near the Batchawan River.

Unusual flippered feet are making their way into the Saint Lawrence River this weekend. Led by underwater explorer and filmmaker Nathalie Lasselin, volunteer divers are combing the riverbed near Beauharnois in Mont茅r茅gie to remove hundreds of tires that have been polluting the aquatic environment for decades.

A sea lion swam free after a rescue team disentangled it near Vancouver Island earlier this week.

Local Spotlight

Cole Haas is more than just an avid fan of the F.W. Johnson Wildcats football team. He's a fixture on the sidelines, a source of encouragement, and a beloved member of the team.

Getting a photograph of a rainbow? Common. Getting a photo of a lightning strike? Rare. Getting a photo of both at the same time? Extremely rare, but it happened to a Manitoba photographer this week.

An anonymous business owner paid off the mortgage for a New Brunswick not-for-profit.

They say a dog is a man鈥檚 best friend. In the case of Darren Cropper, from Bonfield, Ont., his three-year-old Siberian husky and golden retriever mix named Bear literally saved his life.

A growing group of brides and wedding photographers from across the province say they have been taken for tens of thousands of dollars by a Barrie, Ont. wedding photographer.

Paleontologists from the Royal B.C. Museum have uncovered "a trove of extraordinary fossils" high in the mountains of northern B.C., the museum announced Thursday.

The search for a missing ancient 28-year-old chocolate donkey ended with a tragic discovery Wednesday.

The Royal Canadian Mounted Police is celebrating an important milestone in the organization's history: 50 years since the first women joined the force.

It's been a whirlwind of joyful events for a northern Ontario couple who just welcomed a baby into their family and won the $70 million Lotto Max jackpot last month.

Stay Connected